Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohammadpanah, Mahshid
dc.contributor.authorAyatollahi Mehrgardi, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Hélène
dc.contributor.authorLarzul, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMercat, Marie-José
dc.contributor.authorEsmailizadeh, Ali
dc.contributor.authorMomen, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorTusell, Llibertat
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T10:38:03Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T10:38:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-09
dc.identifier.citationMohammadpanah, Mahshid, Ahmad Ayatollahi Mehrgardi, Hélène Gilbert, Catherine Larzul, Marie-José Mercat, Ali Esmailizadeh, Mehdi Momen, and Llibertat Tusell. 2022. "Genic And Non-Genic SNP Contributions To Additive And Dominance Genetic Effects In Purebred And Crossbred Pig Traits". Scientific Reports 12 (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07767-3.ca
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1695
dc.description.abstractThe present research has estimated the additive and dominance genetic variances of genic and intergenic segments for average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT) and pH of the semimembranosus dorsi muscle (PHS). Further, the predictive performance using additive and additive dominance models in a purebred Piétrain (PB) and a crossbred (Piétrain × Large White, CB) pig population was assessed. All genomic regions contributed equally to the additive and dominance genetic variations and lead to the same predictive ability that did not improve with the inclusion of dominance genetic effect and inbreeding in the models. Using all SNPs available, additive genotypic correlations between PB and CB performances for the three traits were high and positive (> 0.83) and dominance genotypic correlation was very inaccurate. Estimates of dominance genotypic correlations between all pairs of traits in both populations were imprecise but positive for ADG-BFT in CB and BFT-PHS in PB and CB with a high probability (> 0.98). Additive and dominance genotypic correlations between BFT and PHS were of different sign in both populations, which could indicate that genes contributing to the additive genetic progress in both traits would have an antagonistic effect when used for exploiting dominance effects in planned matings.ca
dc.format.extent10ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherNature Researchca
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleGenic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traitsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDEC/H2020/633531/EU/Adapting the feed, the animal and the feeding techniques to improve the efficiency and sustainability of monogastric livestock production systems/Feed-a-Geneca
dc.subject.udc636ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07767-3ca
dc.contributor.groupGenètica i Millora Animalca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint