Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGaleb, Luciana do Amaral Gurgel
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Tâmara Duarte
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Camila Jardim
dc.contributor.authorPedernera, Cecília
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorAnater, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorBiondo, Alexander Welker
dc.contributor.authorPimpão, Cláudia Turra
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-31T07:56:37Z
dc.date.available2023-05-31T07:56:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-25
dc.identifier.citationGaleb, Luciana do Amaral Gurgel, Tâmara Duarte Borges, Camila Jardim dos Santos, Cecília Pedernera, Antonio Velarde, Amanda Anater, Alexander Welker Biondo, and Cláudia Turra Pimpão. 2021. "Animal Welfare Assessment In Nine Dog Shelters Of Southern Brazil". Revista Brasileira De Ciências Ambientais 57 (1): 84-92. doi:10.5327/z217694781197.ca
dc.identifier.issn2176-9478ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/2224
dc.description.abstractThe present study has tested the Shelter-Quality Protocol (SQ) and its applicability in nine long-term dog shelters in the Curitiba metropolitan area, State of Paraná, southern Brazil. Welfare indicators were scored on three different levels including shelter, pen and dogs. Data were qualitatively analyzed, presenting an average of 66.67 (±27.63) allocated dogs per shelter, receiving only dry food, with meal frequencies varying from once (44.4%), twice a day (33.3%), and ad libitum (22.2%). Water was available ad libitum in 98.5% of pens and was clean in (89.5%) of shelters. Most of the shelters grouped the dogs by size. Animals were kept indoors (41.0%) or entirely outdoors with only close movable shelters (41.3%), from which 78.5% had materials that could hurt the animals. None of the dogs were panting, crowding, or had any stereotypy behavior. No cough, swelling, and ectoparasites were observed. Animals were in satisfactory body-score condition and clean; no lameness was observed. In the human-animal relationship test, 15.3% of animals showed fearful and aggressive reactions. Hence, the level of shelter-quality was feasible and provided relevant information about the Brazilian dog shelter welfare. However, it is important in future studies to include and adopt additional indicators to gather other relevant aspects of dogs’ welfare, such as health management, environmental enrichment, dogs’ socialization, people involved in the chain, rate of adoption, and turnover of dogs.ca
dc.format.extent9ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.language.isoporca
dc.publisherBrazilian Association of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (ABES)ca
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientaisca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleAnimal welfare assessment in nine dog shelters of southern Brazilca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc636ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5327/Z217694781197ca
dc.contributor.groupBenestar Animalca


Ficheros en el ítem

 
 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir