Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.authorTemple, Déborah
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Marta
dc.contributor.authorEscribano, Damián
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Valls, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorManteca, Xavier
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-04T12:18:44Z
dc.date.available2020-12-04T12:18:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-16
dc.identifier.citationTemple D, Jiménez M, Escribano D, Martín-Valls G, Díaz I, Manteca X. Welfare Benefits of Intradermal Vaccination of Piglets. Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 16;10(10):1898. doi: 10.3390/ani10101898. PMID: 33081216; PMCID: PMC7602853.ca
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1003
dc.description.abstractVaccination is reported as a stressful and painful event for animals. This study investigated whether needle-free intradermal vaccination improves the welfare of weaned pigs through the reduction of stress and pain biomarkers and improvement of behavioural parameters compared to traditional intramuscular injection with a needle. A total of 339 weaned piglets were allocated to 3 treatment groups: Intradermal Application of Liquids (IDAL) pigs, vaccinated against Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV2) by means of intradermal vaccination using a needle-free device Porcilis® PCV ID; Intramuscular (IM) pigs vaccinated against PCV2 with Porcilis® PCV intramuscularly with a needle; CONTROL pigs were managed identically but did not receive any vaccine injection. At the time of the injection, the reaction of IDAL piglets was similar to control piglets, whereas a greater percentage of piglets vaccinated intramuscularly displayed high-pitch vocalizations (7% CONTROL, 7% IDAL, 32% IM) and retreat attempts (3% CONTROL, 7% IDAL, 39% IM). The day after vaccination, IDAL piglets did not differ from the control piglets for any of the behavioural variables studied through scan samplings. IM piglets showed a lower frequency of social negative interactions (p = 0.001) and rope manipulation (p = 0.04) compared to the CONTROL group. Resting postures did not differ between treatments. At 28 h post-vaccination, IDAL piglets presented lower blood C-reactive protein levels (CONTROL = 20 μg/mL; IDAL = 39 μg/mL; IM = 83 μg/mL, p < 0.0001) and blood Haptoglobin (CONTROL = 1.8 mg/mL; IDAL = 1.9 mg/mL vs. IM = 3.1 mg/mL, p < 0.0001) compared to IM piglets. Salivary chromogranin A and alpha-amylase did not differ between treatment groups when measured 25 min post-vaccination. The method of vaccination did not affect the growth of the piglets or their rectal temperature. These results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination reduces vaccination-related pain in growing pigs.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofAnimalsca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleWelfare Benefits of Intradermal Vaccination of Pigletsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101898ca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Fitxers en aquest element

 
 

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepte que s'indiqui una altra cosa, la llicència de l'ítem es descriu com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comparteix a TwitterComparteix a LinkedinComparteix a FacebookComparteix a TelegramComparteix a WhatsappImprimeix