Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBellvert, J.
dc.contributor.authorMata, M.
dc.contributor.authorVallverdú, X.
dc.contributor.authorParis, C.
dc.contributor.authorMarsal, J.
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T05:32:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T05:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-29
dc.identifier.citationBellvert, J., M. Mata, X. Vallverdú, C. Paris, and J. Marsal. 2020. "Optimizing Precision Irrigation Of A Vineyard To Improve Water Use Efficiency And Profitability By Using A Decision-Oriented Vine Water Consumption Model". Precision Agriculture 22 (2): 319-341. doi:10.1007/s11119-020-09718-2.ca
dc.identifier.issn1385-2256ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/856
dc.description.abstractWhile the agronomic and economic benefits of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) strategies have long been established in red wine grape varieties, spatial variability in water requirements across a vineyard limits their practical application. This study aims to evaluate the performance of an integrated methodology—based on a vine water consumption model and remote sensing data—to optimize the precision irrigation (PI) of a 100-ha commercial vineyard during two consecutive growing seasons. In addition, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was conducted of the tested strategy. Using an NDVI generated map, a vineyard with 52 irrigation sectors and the varieties Tempranillo, Cabernet and Syrah was classified in three categories (Low, Medium and High). The proposed methodology allowed viticulturists to adopt a precise RDI strategy, and, despite differences in water requirement between irrigation sectors, pre-defined stem water potential thresholds were not exceeded. In both years, the difference between maximum and minimum water applied in the different irrigation sectors varied by as much as 25.6%. Annual transpiration simulations showed ranges of 240.1–340.8 mm for 2016 and 298.6–366.9 mm for 2017. According to the CBA, total savings of 7090.00 € (2016) and 9960.00 € (2017) were obtained in the 100-ha vineyard with the PI strategy compared to not PI. After factoring in PI technology and labor costs of 5090 €, the net benefit was 20.0 € ha−1 in 2016 and 48.7 € ha−1 in 2017. The water consumption model adopted here to optimize PI is shown to enhance vineyard profitability, water use efficiency and yield.ca
dc.format.extent23ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringerca
dc.relation.ispartofPrecision Agricultureca
dc.rightsAttribution- 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleOptimizing precision irrigation of a vineyard to improve water use efficiency and profitability by using a decision-oriented vine water consumption modelca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc631ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09718-2ca
dc.contributor.groupÚs Eficient de l'Aigua en Agriculturaca


Ficheros en el ítem

 
 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution- 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir