Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDíaz, I.
dc.contributor.authorPujols, J.
dc.contributor.authorCano, E.
dc.contributor.authorCuadrado, R.
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, N.
dc.contributor.authorMateu, E.
dc.contributor.authorMartín, M.
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T12:08:40Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T12:00:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-12
dc.identifier.citationDíaz, I., J. Pujols, E. Cano, R. Cuadrado, N. Navarro, E. Mateu, and M. Martín. 2021. "Assessment Of Three Commercial Elisas For The Detection Of Antibodies Against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus At Different Stages Of The Immune Response". Veterinary Immunology And Immunopathology 234: 110206. doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2021.110206.ca
dc.identifier.issn0165-2427ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1110
dc.description.abstractThree commercial ELISAs -two based on spike (E1 and E3) and one on nucleocapsid protein (E2)-were used to analyze the development and persistence of antibodies against Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). Seventy-five four-week-old PEDV-negative piglets were inoculated orally with a European G1b PEDV (INOC) and fourteen were kept as controls (CTRL). After the inoculation, E3 detected positive animals as soon as 7 days post inoculation (dpi), while the earliest detection with E1 and E2 was at 14 dpi. All samples were positive at 21 and 28 dpi using E1 and E3, respectively, while E2 failed to detect 23.3 % of the inoculated pigs at any time point. The percentages of positive samples were different through the study: E1 and E3 > E2 from 14 to 56 dpi; and E3 > E1 > E2 from 56 to 154 dpi (P < 0.05). Five months after the inoculation, E3 still detected 92.0 % (IC95 % = 85.1–98.8 %) of pigs as positive, while E1 and E2 detected only 27.0 % (IC95 % = 16.0–37.9 %) and 0%, respectively. The sensitivity for E2 never exceeded 0.62. Specificity was 1 for all ELISAs. These different outcomes could be related to the ELISA strategies (indirect versus competition), the antigens used, the cut-off, or to other intrinsic factors of each test. The observed differences could be of importance when assessing whether older animals, such as fatteners or gilts, had previously been in contact with PEDV.ca
dc.format.extent15ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Immunology and Immunopathologyca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleAssessment of three commercial ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus at different stages of the immune responseca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.relation.projectIDINIA/Programa Estatal de I+D+I orientada a los retos de la sociedad/E-RTA2015-00003- C02-01/ES/Nuevos virus porcinos causantes de diarrea en España/ca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2021.110206ca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint