Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Cao, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorLorca-Oró, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorPujols, Joan
dc.contributor.authorCano-Terriza, David
dc.contributor.authorRisalde, María de los Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Ruiz, Saúl
dc.contributor.authorCaballero-Gómez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Bocanegra, Ignacio
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T14:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-29
dc.identifier.citationDíaz-Cao, José Manuel, Cristina Lorca-Oró, Joan Pujols, David Cano-Terriza, María de los Ángeles Risalde, Saúl Jiménez-Ruiz, Javier Caballero-Gómez, and Ignacio García-Bocanegra. 2020. "Evaluation Of Two Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays For Diagnosis Of Bluetongue Virus In Wild Ruminants". Comparative Immunology, Microbiology And Infectious Diseases 70: 101461. doi:10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101461.ca
dc.identifier.issn0147-9571ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1128
dc.description.abstractBluetongue (BT) is a reportable re-emerging vector-borne disease of animal health concern. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are frequently used in BT surveillance programs in domestic ruminants, but their diagnostic accuracy has not been evaluated for wild ruminants, which can play an important role as natural reservoirs of bluetongue virus (BTV). The aim of this study was to assess two commercial ELISAs for BT diagnosis in wild ruminants using control sera of known BTV infection status and field samples. When control sera were tested, the double recognition ELISA (DR-ELISA) showed 100 % sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp), while the competitive ELISA (C-ELISA) had 86.4 % Se and 97.1 % Sp. Using field samples, the selected latent-class analysis model showed 95.7 % Se and 85.9 % Sp for DR-ELISA, 58.2 % Se and 95.8 % Sp for C-ELISA and 84.2 % Se for the serum neutralization test (SNT). Our results indicate that the DR-ELISA may be a useful diagnostic method to assess BTV circulation in endemic areas, while the C-ELISA should be selected when free-areas are surveyed. The discrepancy between control and field samples point out that the inclusion of field samples is required to assess the accuracy of commercial ELISAs for the serological diagnosis of BTV in wild ruminants.ca
dc.format.extent19ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseasesca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEvaluation of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of bluetongue virus in wild ruminantsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.date.embargoEnd2021-02-28T01:00:00Z
dc.embargo.terms12 mesosca
dc.relation.projectIDINIA/ /FAU2008-00019-C03-01/ES/Epidemiología, control y aspectos entomológicos de la lengua azul (BTV) en rumiantes silvestres en España/ca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101461ca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Files in this item

 

This document contains embargoed files until 2021-02-28T

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/