Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBellvert, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorNieto, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorPelechá, Ana
dc.contributor.authorJofre-Čekalović, Christian
dc.contributor.authorZazurca, Lourdes
dc.contributor.authorMiarnau, Xavier
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-15T14:07:43Z
dc.date.available2021-04-15T14:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-10
dc.identifier.citationBellvert, Joaquim, Héctor Nieto, Ana Pelechá, Christian Jofre-Čekalović, Lourdes Zazurca, and Xavier Miarnau. 2021. "Remote Sensing Energy Balance Model For The Assessment Of Crop Evapotranspiration And Water Status In An Almond Rootstock Collection". Frontiers In Plant Science 12. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.608967.ca
dc.identifier.issn1664-462Xca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1246
dc.description.abstractOne of the objectives of many studies conducted by breeding programs is to characterize and select rootstocks well-adapted to drought conditions. In recent years, field high-throughput phenotyping methods have been developed to characterize plant traits and to identify the most water use efficient varieties and rootstocks. However, none of these studies have been able to quantify the behavior of crop evapotranspiration in almond rootstocks under different water regimes. In this study, remote sensing phenotyping methods were used to assess the evapotranspiration of almond cv. “Marinada” grafted onto a rootstock collection. In particular, the two-source energy balance and Shuttleworth and Wallace models were used to, respectively, estimate the actual and potential evapotranspiration of almonds grafted onto 10 rootstock under three different irrigation treatments. For this purpose, three flights were conducted during the 2018 and 2019 growing seasons with an aircraft equipped with a thermal and multispectral camera. Stem water potential (Ψstem) was also measured concomitant to image acquisition. Biophysical traits of the vegetation were firstly assessed through photogrammetry techniques, spectral vegetation indices and the radiative transfer model PROSAIL. The estimates of canopy height, leaf area index and daily fraction of intercepted radiation had root mean square errors of 0.57 m, 0.24 m m–1 and 0.07%, respectively. Findings of this study showed significant differences between rootstocks in all of the evaluated parameters. Cadaman® and Garnem® had the highest canopy vigor traits, evapotranspiration, Ψstem and kernel yield. In contrast, Rootpac® 20 and Rootpac® R had the lowest values of the same parameters, suggesting that this was due to an incompatibility between plum-almond species or to a lower water absorption capability of the rooting system. Among the rootstocks with medium canopy vigor, Adesoto and IRTA 1 had a lower evapotranspiration than Rootpac® 40 and Ishtara®. Water productivity (WP) (kg kernel/mm water evapotranspired) tended to decrease with Ψstem, mainly in 2018. Cadaman® and Garnem® had the highest WP, followed by INRA GF-677, IRTA 1, IRTA 2, and Rootpac® 40. Despite the low Ψstem of Rootpac® R, the WP of this rootstock was also high.ca
dc.format.extent18ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaca
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Plant Scienceca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleRemote Sensing Energy Balance Model for the Assessment of Crop Evapotranspiration and Water Status in an Almond Rootstock Collectionca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMICIU/Programa Estatal de I+D+I orientada a los retos de la sociedad/PCI2019-103649/ES/Managing water resources within Mediterranean agrosystems by accounting for spatial structures and connectivities/ALTOSca
dc.relation.projectIDEC/H2020/823965/EU/Accounting for Climate Change in Water and Agriculture Management/ACCWAca
dc.subject.udc631ca
dc.subject.udc633ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.608967ca
dc.contributor.groupFructiculturaca
dc.contributor.groupÚs Eficient de l'Aigua en Agriculturaca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint