Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeila-Ibáñez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorPintado, Ester
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Roser
dc.contributor.authorFernández Aguilar, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorVidal, Enric
dc.contributor.authorAragon, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorAbarca, M. Lourdes
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T13:49:10Z
dc.date.available2022-04-20T13:49:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-08
dc.identifier.citationNeila-Ibáñez, Carlos, Ester Pintado, Roser Velarde, Xavier Fernández Aguilar, Enric Vidal, Virginia Aragon, and M. Lourdes Abarca. 2022. "First Report Of Streptococcus Ruminantium In Wildlife: Phenotypic Differences With A Spanish Domestic Ruminant Isolate". Microbiology Research 13 (1): 102-113. doi:10.3390/microbiolres13010008.ca
dc.identifier.issn2036-7481ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/1746
dc.description.abstractStreptococcus ruminantium is a recent reclassification of the former Streptococcus suis serovar 33. Although knowledge about S. suis is extensive, information on S. ruminantium host range and pathogenic potential is still scarce. This bacterium has been isolated from lesions in domestic ruminants, but there are no reports in wild animals. Here, we provide information on lesions associated with S. ruminantium in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and domestic sheep from NE Spain, as well as phenotypic biopatterns and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of the isolates. Overall, lesions caused by S. ruminantium were similar to those caused by S. suis, excluding polyserositis. Heterogeneity of the phenotypic profiles was observed within the S. ruminantium strains by VITEK-2, resulting in only two tests common to all S. ruminantium isolates and different from S. suis: Alpha-Galactosidase and Methyl-B-D-Glucopyranoside, both positive for S. suis and negative for S. ruminantium strains. Isolates from Pyrenean chamois were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested, except danofloxacin, whereas the domestic sheep isolate was resistant to tetracycline. In conclusion, S. ruminantium can cause infection and be associated with pathology in both wild and domestic ruminants. Due to its phenotypic diversity, a specific PCR is optimal for identification in routine diagnosis.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofMicrobiology Researchca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleFirst Report of Streptococcus ruminantium in Wildlife: Phenotypic Differences with a Spanish Domestic Ruminant Isolateca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDEC/H2020/727966/EU/Program for Innovative Global Prevention of Streptococcus suis/PIGSsca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres13010008ca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint