Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoeters, Marloes
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Morante, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorvan Schaik, Gerdien
dc.contributor.authorSegalés, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorRushton, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorSteeneveld, Wilma
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T16:28:20Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T16:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-17
dc.identifier.citationBoeters, Marloes, Beatriz Garcia-Morante, G. Van Schaik, Joaquím Segalés, Jonathan Rushton, and W. Steeneveld. 2023. “The Economic Impact of Endemic Respiratory Disease in Pigs and Related Interventions - a Systematic Review.” Porcine Health Management 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00342-w.ca
dc.identifier.issn2055-5660ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/2857
dc.description.abstractBackground Understanding the financial consequences of endemically prevalent pathogens within the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) and the effects of interventions assists decision-making regarding disease prevention and control. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what economic studies have been carried out on infectious endemic respiratory disease in pigs, what methods are being used, and, when feasible, to identify the economic impacts of PRDC pathogens and the costs and benefits of interventions. Results By following the PRISMA method, a total of 58 studies were deemed eligible for the purpose of this systematic review. Twenty-six studies used data derived from European countries, 18 from the US, 6 from Asia, 4 from Oceania, and 4 from other countries, i.e., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Main findings from selected publications were: (1) The studies mainly considered endemic scenarios on commercial fattening farms; (2) The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus was by far the most studied pathogen, followed by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, but the absence or presence of other endemic respiratory pathogens was often not verified or accounted for; (3) Most studies calculated the economic impact using primary production data, whereas twelve studies modelled the impact using secondary data only; (4) Seven different economic methods were applied across studies; (5) A large variation exists in the cost and revenue components considered in calculations, with feed costs and reduced carcass value included the most often; (6) The reported median economic impact of one or several co-existing respiratory pathogen(s) ranged from €1.70 to €8.90 per nursery pig, €2.30 to €15.35 per fattening pig, and €100 to €323 per sow per year; and (7) Vaccination was the most studied intervention, and the outcomes of all but three intervention-focused studies were neutral or positive. Conclusion The outcomes and discussion from this systematic review provide insight into the studies, their methods, the advantages and limitations of the existing research, and the reported impacts from the endemic respiratory disease complex for pig production systems worldwide. Future research should improve the consistency and comparability of economic assessments by ensuring the inclusion of high impact cost and revenue components and expressing results similarly.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101000494 (DECIDE).ca
dc.format.extent18ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherBMCca
dc.relation.ispartofPorcine Health Managementca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleThe economic impact of endemic respiratory disease in pigs and related interventions - a systematic reviewca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDEC/H2020/101000494/EU/Data-driven control and prioritisation of non-EU-regulated contagious animal diseases/DECIDEca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00342-wca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint