Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorTorrecillas, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorKashinskaya, Elena
dc.contributor.authorAndree, Karl B.
dc.contributor.authorSolovyev, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorGisbert, Enric
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T07:17:59Z
dc.date.available2024-04-19T07:17:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-22
dc.identifier.citationRuiz, Alberto, Silvia Torrecillas, Elena N. Kashinskaya, Karl B. Andrée, Mikhail Solovyev, and Enric Gisbert. 2024. “Comparative Study of the Gut Microbial Communities Collected by Scraping and Swabbing in a Fish Model: A Comprehensive Guide to Promote Non-lethal Procedures for Gut Microbial Studies.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1374803.ca
dc.identifier.issn2297-1769ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/2932
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, we propose the use of swabs in non-lethal sampling procedures to collect the mucosa-adhered gut microbiota from the posterior intestine of fish, and therefore, we compare the bacterial communities collected by conventional scraping and by swabbing methods. For this purpose, samples of the posterior intestine of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were collected first using the swabbing approach, and after fish euthanasia, by mucosa scraping. Finally, bacterial communities were compared by 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing. Results from the current study revealed that similar values of bacterial richness and diversity were found for both sampling procedures. Similarly, there were no differences between procedures when using qualitative metrics (Jaccard and unweighted UniFrac) for estimating inter-individual diversity, but the quantitative metrics (Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac) showed a higher dispersion when samples were obtained by swabbing compared to scraping. In terms of bacterial composition, there were differences in abundance for the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The cause of these differential abundances may be the inability of the swab to access to certain areas, such as the basal region of the intestinal villi. Moreover, swabbing allowed a higher representation of low abundant taxa, which may also have an important role in host microbiome regardless of their low abundance. Overall, our results demonstrate that the sampling method is a factor to be considered in experimental design when studying gut bacterial communities to avoid potential biases in the interpretation or comparison of results from different studies. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure (swabbing vs scraping) are discussed in detail, concluding that swabbing can be implemented as a reliable and non-lethal procedure for posterior gut microbiota studies, which is of particular interest for animal welfare and the 3Rs principle, and may offer a wide range of novel applications.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the project TED2021-132054B-C21 (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de España) under the frame of the call 2021 entitled “Proyectos Estratégicos Orientados a la Transición Ecológica y a la Transición Digital.” EK and MS were supported by the Russian international scientific collaboration program Mega-grant (No. 075-15-2022-1134) and the Russian Science Foundation (grant number 23-74-10101). ST was supported by a Ramon y Cajal contract (ref. RYC2021-031414-I) from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN). AR was supported by a predoctoral grant (PRE2019-091259) funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spanish Government).ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherFrontiersca
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleComparative study of the gut microbial communities collected by scraping and swabbing in a fish model: a comprehensive guide to promote non-lethal procedures for gut microbial studiesca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMICINN/Plan Estatal de Investigación, Científica, Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/TED2021-132054B-C21/ES/Promoting circular economy by the assessment and validation of mushroom industry by-products as sustainable ingredients for diets in swine livestock and fish aquaculture species/GreenBlueCircleca
dc.relation.projectIDMICINN/Programa Estatal para desarrollar, atraer y retener talento/RYC2021-031414-I/ES/ /ca
dc.subject.udc637ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1374803ca
dc.contributor.groupAqüiculturaca


Ficheros en el ítem

 
 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir