Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrado, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorGairin, Ignasi
dc.contributor.authorFalco, Silvia
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T11:35:36Z
dc.date.available2024-07-04T11:35:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-20
dc.identifier.citationPatricia, Prado, Ignasi Gairin, and Falco Silvia. 2024. “Effect of Bivalves’ Sand Burial Capacity on Predation in the Invasive Blue Crab, Callinectes Sapidus.” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12 (6): 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12061028.ca
dc.identifier.issn2077-1312ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3064
dc.description.abstractIn the Ebro Delta (Catalonia, Spain), the abundance of burrowing bivalves has dramatically decreased, with the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, being blamed by shellfish collectors. Trends from 2010 evidence a decrease in the capture of clams (Ruditapes spp.) before 2016 (start of blue crab fisheries), although a further decline in both clams and cockles (Cerastoderma glaucum) occurred in 2018. In contrast, captures of razor clams (Ensis siliqua) have increased by 3.6-fold since 2016. Predation risk for these taxa, with contrasting burrowing capacities (1.7 ± 0.3 cm, 0.4 ± 0.2 cm, and 26.3 ± 0.1 cm, respectively), was assessed using predation preference (N = 5 tanks; 5 individuals of each species) and no-choice experiments (N = 5 tanks; 15 individuals of the same taxa) in the absence and presence of sand. The results showed that, in the absence of sand, razor clams were fully preyed upon in 24 h, clams in 96 h, and cockles reached 60% after 144 h. Conversely, when sand was present, only 4% of razor clams were predated, while clams and cockles reached 60–100% in 120–144 h. The no-choice results featured similar patterns, depending on substrate availability. Overall, clams and cockles appear to be greatly vulnerable to blue crab predation, whereas razor clams may escape thanks to their deeper burrowing capacity.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipPredation experiments were supported by the Spanish Government (Ministry of Science and Technology) under the ECESIS project (PID2020-118476RR-C21) awarded to P. Prado and S. Falco.ca
dc.format.extent11ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Marine Science and Engineeringca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleEffect of Bivalves’ Sand Burial Capacity on Predation in the Invasive Blue Crab, Callinectes sapidusca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMICIU/Programa Estatal de generación del conocimiento y fortalecimiento científico y tecnológico del sistema I+D+I y Programa Estatal de I+D+I orientada a los retos de la sociedad/PID2020-118476RR-C21/ES/Ecology and impact of the Atlantic blue crab in Spain Mediterranean coastal lagoons, estuaries, and adjacent waters/ECESISca
dc.subject.udc637ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12061028ca
dc.contributor.groupAqüiculturaca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint