Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.authorLopez, G.
dc.contributor.authorArbonés Florensa, Amadeo
dc.contributor.authordel Campo, J.
dc.contributor.authorMata Sola, Mercè
dc.contributor.authorVallverdú, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorGirona, Joan
dc.contributor.authorMarsal, Jordi
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-22T14:07:10Z
dc.date.available2024-11-22T14:07:10Z
dc.date.issued2008-09-01
dc.identifier.citationLópez, G., A. Arbones, J. Del Campo, M. Mata, X. Vallverdu, J. Girona, and J. Marsal. 2008. “Response of Peach Trees to Regulated Deficit Irrigation During Stage 2 of Fruit Development and Summer Pruning.” Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (3): 479-491. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2008063-340ca
dc.identifier.issn1695-971Xca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3404
dc.description.abstractRegulated deficit irrigation (RDI) during stage II of fruit development and summer pruning (watersprout removal, WSR) can be used to control excessive vegetative growth in high-density peach orchards. The dynamics of tree-light interception after the application of RDI (no irrigation during stage II) and WSR in summer were evaluated during two consecutive years. RDI and WSR treatments produced similar reductions in the percentage of light intercepted by the tree at the end of the 2-year experiment. However, it was not possible to produce the same seasonal dynamics in the percentage of light intercepted by the tree using the RDI and the WSR techniques; RDI trees showed a gradual reduction in the amount of light intercepted as the productive cycle progressed, while WSR trees showed an immediate reduction in the amount of light intercepted. Moreover, the mechanisms responsible for vegetative growth reduction were different in the RDI and the WSR techniques. The RDI technique was associated with reductions in tree water status and decreases in gravimetric soil water (θg) and fruit growth capacity. RDI may have reduced θg below the threshold required for optimum fruit growth, whereas WSR reduced water consumption, improved water status and therefore could have benefited fruit growth. Therefore, RDI and WSR greatly differ when the mechanisms responsible for vegetative growth reduction are taken into consideration.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded in part by Spanish Ministry of Research and Technology (MCyT) project AGL2002- 0059 and IRTA. Special thanks to SAT RIO CINCA for facilitating the experimental work carried out in their commercial orchards. The authors would also like to thank Monica Elias, Diego Manresa, Victor Manuel Reyes, Josep Ramon Solans and Natalia Olivo for their hard work in the field.ca
dc.format.extent13ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicasca
dc.relation.ispartofSpanish Journal of Agricultural Researchca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleResponse of peach trees to regulated deficit irrigation during stage II of fruit development and summer pruningca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMICYT/ /AGL2002-00569/ES/ /ca
dc.subject.udc633ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008063-340ca
dc.contributor.groupÚs Eficient de l'Aigua en Agriculturaca


Fitxers en aquest element

 

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepte que s'indiqui una altra cosa, la llicència de l'ítem es descriu com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comparteix a TwitterComparteix a LinkedinComparteix a FacebookComparteix a TelegramComparteix a WhatsappImprimeix