| dc.contributor.author | Lopez, G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arbonés Florensa, Amadeo | |
| dc.contributor.author | del Campo, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mata Sola, Mercè | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vallverdú, Xavier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Girona, Joan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marsal, Jordi | |
| dc.contributor.other | Producció Vegetal | ca |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-22T14:07:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-22T14:07:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-09-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | López, G., A. Arbones, J. Del Campo, M. Mata, X. Vallverdu, J. Girona, and J. Marsal. 2008. “Response of Peach Trees to Regulated Deficit Irrigation During Stage 2 of Fruit Development and Summer Pruning.” Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (3): 479-491. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2008063-340 | ca |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1695-971X | ca |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3404 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) during stage II of fruit development and summer pruning (watersprout removal,
WSR) can be used to control excessive vegetative growth in high-density peach orchards. The dynamics of tree-light
interception after the application of RDI (no irrigation during stage II) and WSR in summer were evaluated during
two consecutive years. RDI and WSR treatments produced similar reductions in the percentage of light intercepted by
the tree at the end of the 2-year experiment. However, it was not possible to produce the same seasonal dynamics in
the percentage of light intercepted by the tree using the RDI and the WSR techniques; RDI trees showed a gradual
reduction in the amount of light intercepted as the productive cycle progressed, while WSR trees showed an immediate
reduction in the amount of light intercepted. Moreover, the mechanisms responsible for vegetative growth reduction
were different in the RDI and the WSR techniques. The RDI technique was associated with reductions in tree water
status and decreases in gravimetric soil water (θg) and fruit growth capacity. RDI may have reduced θg below the
threshold required for optimum fruit growth, whereas WSR reduced water consumption, improved water status and
therefore could have benefited fruit growth. Therefore, RDI and WSR greatly differ when the mechanisms responsible
for vegetative growth reduction are taken into consideration. | ca |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was funded in part by Spanish Ministry of Research and Technology (MCyT) project AGL2002- 0059 and IRTA. Special thanks to SAT RIO CINCA for facilitating the experimental work carried out in their commercial orchards. The authors would also like to thank Monica Elias, Diego Manresa, Victor Manuel Reyes, Josep Ramon Solans and Natalia Olivo for their hard work in the field. | ca |
| dc.format.extent | 13 | ca |
| dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
| dc.publisher | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas | ca |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research | ca |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.title | Response of peach trees to regulated deficit irrigation during stage II of fruit development and summer pruning | ca |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca |
| dc.rights.accessLevel | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.embargo.terms | cap | ca |
| dc.relation.projectID | MICYT/ /AGL2002-00569/ES/ / | ca |
| dc.subject.udc | 633 | ca |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008063-340 | ca |
| dc.contributor.group | Ús Eficient de l'Aigua en Agricultura | ca |