Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Victor
dc.contributor.authorKalcsits, Lee
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-11T14:04:48Z
dc.date.available2024-12-11T14:04:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-24
dc.identifier.citationBlanco, Víctor and Kalcsits Lee. 2024. "Relating microtensiometer-based trunk water potential with sap flow, canopy temperature, and trunk and fruit diameter variations for irrigated ‘Honeycrisp’ apple". Frontiers in Plant Science. 15:1393028. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1393028ca
dc.identifier.issn1664-462Xca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3447
dc.description.abstractInstrumentation plays a key role in modern horticulture. Thus, the microtensiomenter, a new plant-based sensor that continuously monitors trunk water potential (Ψtrunk) can help in irrigation management decisions. To compare the response of the Ψtrunk with other continuous tree water status indicators such as the sap flow rate, the difference between canopy and air temperatures, or the variations of the trunk and fruit diameter, all the sensors were installed in 2022 in a commercial orchard of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees with M.9 rootstocks in Washinton State (USA). From the daily evolution of the Ψtrunk, five indicators were considered: predawn, midday, minimum, daily mean, and daily range (the difference between the daily maximum and minimum values). The daily range of Ψtrunk was the most linked to the maximum daily shrinkage (MDS; R2 = 0.42), the canopy-to-air temperature (Tc-Ta; R2 = 0.32), and the sap flow rate (SF; R2 = 0.30). On the other hand, the relative fruit growth rate (FRGR) was more related to the minimum Ψtrunk (R2 = 0.33) and the daily mean Ψtrunk (R2 = 0.32) than to the daily range of Ψtrunk. All indicators derived from Ψtrunk identified changes in tree water status after each irrigation event and had low coefficients of variation and high sensitivity. These results encourage Ψtrunk as a promising candidate for continuous monitoring of tree water status, however, more research is needed to better relate these measures with other widely studied plant-based indicators and identify good combinations of sensors and threshold values.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Washington State Tree Fruit Research Committee, and the AgAID Institute. LK was partially supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1014919. VB acknowledges the postdoctoral financial support received from the Fundación Séneca (Región de Murcia, Spain, 21261/PD/19). VB acknowledges the postdoctoral financial support received from the Fundación Séneca (Región de Murcia, Spain, 21261/PD/19).ca
dc.format.extent15ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaca
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Plant Scienceca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleRelating microtensiometer-based trunk water potential with sap flow, canopy temperature, and trunk and fruit diameter variations for irrigated ‘Honeycrisp’ appleca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc631ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1393028ca
dc.contributor.groupÚs Eficient de l'Aigua en Agriculturaca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint