Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBettencourt Nascimento, José Gonçalo
dc.contributor.authorVillegas, Dolors
dc.contributor.authorÁlvaro-Fuentes, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorCantero-Martínez, Carlos
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T15:12:31Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T15:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-05
dc.identifier.citationNascimento, Gonçalo, Dolors Villegas, Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes, and Carlos Cantero‐Martínez. 2024. Alternative Cereal Crop Rotations in a No‐tillage Dryland under Mediterranean Conditions. Agronomy Journal 116 (6): 3117–29. doi:10.1002/agj2.21683.ca
dc.identifier.issn0002-1962ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3480
dc.description.abstractCereal crops are frequently rotated with broadleaf crops to achieve the benefits associated with crop diversification. However, broadleaf crops often fail in Mediterranean drylands due to their lower adaptation to drought. Alternative cereal crops such as triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) and oat (Avena sativa L.) can help diversify drylands in the Ebro valley, dominated by barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation. A 6-year field experiment was conducted with five crop sequences under no-tillage: triticale–wheat–barley (TWB), oat–wheat–barley (OWB), fallow–wheat–barley, monocrop wheat, and monocrop barley. Wheat and barley grain yield, N use efficiency, and water use efficiency responses were evaluated, and economic analyses of the whole sequences were performed. Oat increased subsequent wheat yields by 15% and barley yields by 12% (p < 0.001) compared to monocropping. Similar water and N availability at sowing suggest additional synergies in an OWB rotation (possibly pest reduction), contributing to the yield increase of both crops. However, this rotation was less profitable than a TWB rotation (p = 0.002) due to the limited adaptation of oat to Mediterranean settings. Long fallowing lacked consistent benefits in water and N availability for subsequent crops. This practice protects farmers from economic losses in low-yielding seasons, but there is an associated opportunity cost in favorable years. The introduction of alternative cereal crops has demonstrated benefits for wheat and barley production, although greater understanding of the synergistic mechanisms involved is essential to ascertain whether resource efficiency is maintained beyond the studied timeframe.ca
dc.format.extent13ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy Journalca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleAlternative cereal crop rotations in a no-tillage dryland under Mediterranean conditionsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMINECO/Programa Estatal de I+D+I orientada a los retos de la sociedad/AGL2017-84529-C3-3-R/ES/Diversificación de cultivos para la sostenibilidad de los agrosistemas mediterráneos/ /ca
dc.subject.udc633ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21683ca
dc.contributor.groupCultius Extensius Sosteniblesca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint