Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSolà-Oriol, D.
dc.contributor.authorRoura, E.
dc.contributor.authorTorrallardona, David
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T12:14:06Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T12:14:06Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-01
dc.identifier.citationSolà-Oriol, D., Roura, E., and Torrallardona, D. 2011. “Feed preference in pigs: Effect of selected protein, fat, and fiber sources at different inclusion rates1”. Journal of Animal Science 89(10): 3219-3227. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-3885ca
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3531
dc.description.abstractThree double-choice feeding experiments were conducted to study the effect of different feedstuffs on feed preference in pigs. Fifteen protein sources, 6 fat sources, and 3 fiber sources were evaluated in Exp. 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Pigs were offered a series of double choices between a common reference diet and the diet with the ingredient under evaluation. The reference diet contained a soybean meal product with 56% CP (SBM-56), sunflower oil, and wheat bran, which were considered as the feedstuffs of reference for the protein, fat, and fiber sources, respectively. Preference, expressed as percentage of the tested diet to total feed intake, was affected by feedstuff nature and by its inclusion rate. In Exp. 1, feeds with fish meal at 50 and 100 g·kg−1, dried porcine hydrolyzed protein at 50 g·kg−1, and lupine, soybean meal with 44% CP, and dried skim milk at 100 g·kg−1 were preferred (P < 0.05) to the reference feed with SBM-56. On the contrary, relative to SBM-56, an avoidance (preference less than 50%) was observed for potato protein at all inclusion rates tested, rapeseed meal and acid milk whey at 100 and 200 g·kg−1, and dried porcine hydrolyzed protein, soybean protein concentrate, wheat gluten, and sunflower meal at 200 g·kg−1. The storage of dried skim milk, soybean protein concentrate, and potato protein for 10 mo resulted in a reduction (P < 0.001) of their preference values. In Exp. 2, the feed with palm oil (at 30 g·kg−1) was preferred (P < 0.05), whereas feeds with linseed oil (at 30 and 100 g·kg−1) and soybean oil (at 100 g·kg−1) were avoided (P < 0.05) when contrasted with the reference feed with sunflower oil. Finally, in Exp. 3 diets with dehydrated alfalfa and sugar beet pulp at 130 g·kg−1 had a reduced (P < 0.05) preference compared with the reference diet with wheat bran. It is concluded that feedstuff nature, inclusion rate, and freshness affect feed preference in pigs. Feedstuff preferences should be taken into account during diet formulation, particularly at critical stages such as immediately after weaning.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by CDTI (Project 050369; Spanish Innovation Agency, Ministry of Industry Tourism and Trade, Madrid, Spain). The support of IRTA’s laboratory and farm staff is acknowledged.ca
dc.format.extent29ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherOxford University Pressca
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Scienceca
dc.rightsCopyright © 2011, Oxford University Pressca
dc.titleFeed preference in pigs: Effect of selected protein, fat, and fiber sources at different inclusion ratesca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.terms12 mesosca
dc.relation.projectIDCDTI/ /050369/ES/ /ca
dc.subject.udc636ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3885ca
dc.contributor.groupNutrició Animalca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint