Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPérez-Méndez, Néstor
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz, Carles
dc.contributor.authorCATALA FORNER, MARIA DEL MAR
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-01T22:25:40Z
dc.date.available2025-02-01T22:25:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-21
dc.identifier.citationPérez-Méndez, N., C. Alcaraz, and M. Catala-Forner. 2025. “Ecological Restoration of Field Margins Enhances Biodiversity and Multiple Ecosystem Services in Rice Agroecosystems.” Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 382: 109484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109484.ca
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3602
dc.description.abstractEcological restoration of non-productive agricultural areas such as field margins has been identified as a key priority to enhance biodiversity and promote multiple ecosystem services within agroecosystems. Field margin restoration is especially important in rice (Oryza sativa, L), a globally important crop which occupies around 15 % of world cropland surface. Even though assessment of how ecosystem service multifunctionality varies across different restoration strategies is scarce. Here, by using a 3-year field scale experiment, we evaluated how different restoration strategies (i.e., hedgerows, flower strips and passive restoration) contribute to ecosystem service multifunctionality in rice farming. We focused on the simultaneous provision of biodiversity enhancement, pest and weed control, mitigation of invasive species impact, and soil protection. We found that all restoration strategies substantially increased multifunctionality when compared to non-restored margins, with improved plant and natural enemy diversity, reduced weed abundance, enhanced protection against the invasive red swamp crawfish, and decreased soil erosion. Multifunctionality was similar across restoration strategies, yet the passive spontaneous restoration emerged as the most economically feasible. Overall, our results underscore the value of restoring non-productive areas such as field margins to promote rice multifunctional landscapes. Specifically, passive restoration strategies offer a promising approach to enhance multiple ecosystem services while remaining cost-effective, supporting both biodiversity conservation and sustainable agricultural production.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Origins program of Kellogg’s Company. Néstor Pérez-Méndez was granted with a Ramón y Cajal Fellowship (RYC2021–033599-I) funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/ 501100011033. We acknowledge Pere Luque and Rubén Tarifa for advising us on arthropod and plant identification, respectively. We are also in debt with the technical staff that helped in data collection: Juan Blas Fernández, Oriol Ferré, and Raúl Llevat. We finally acknowledge Hugo Marrero for his thoughtful feedback during the initial stages of the study.ca
dc.format.extent9ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmentca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleEcological restoration of field margins enhances biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in rice agroecosystemsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMICINN/ /RYC2021-033599-I/ES/ /ca
dc.subject.udc633ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109484ca
dc.contributor.groupAigües Marines i Continentalsca
dc.contributor.groupCultius Extensius Sosteniblesca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint