Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPérez-Vendrell, Anna Maria
dc.contributor.authorHernández, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorLlauradó, L.
dc.contributor.authorSchierle, J.
dc.contributor.authorBrufau, J.
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T10:41:27Z
dc.date.available2025-05-08T10:41:27Z
dc.date.issued2001-03-01
dc.identifier.citationPérez-Vendrell, A.M., J.M. Hernández, L. Llauradó, J. Schierle, and J. Brufau. 2001. «Influence Of Source And Ratio Of Xanthophyll Pigments On Broiler Chicken Pigmentation And Performance». Poultry Science 80 (3): 320-326. doi: 10.1093/ps/80.3.320ca
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/3803
dc.description.abstractOne experiment was conducted using 960 1-d-old, sexed broilers of Ross 308 strain from 1 to 43 d to evaluate if one type of chemically isomerized marigold with 25% of xanthophylls as zeaxanthin (SME-25) could produce pigmentation equivalent to the current addition of conventional marigold with 10% of xanthophylls as zeaxanthin (SME-10) plus canthaxanthin (CTX) in practical broiler diets (maize-wheat-soybean). Birds were allocated in 32 pens, in a randomized complete block design (four blocks × four treatments). The treatments consisted of a nonpigmented control (T1), a combination of 35 ppm of yellow xanthophylls (YX) from SME-10 + 5 ppm of CTX (T2), a combination of 32 ppm of YX from SME-10 + 2 ppm of CTX (T4), and one treatment with 40 ppm of YX from a new SME-25 (T3). There were no significant treatment effects on chicken performance. All color parameters (Minolta coordinates, Roche color fan scores, Rank test) presented significant differences (P < 0.0001) because of dietary pigments on shanks and breast skin. Birds fed the SME-25 diet had less pigmentation than those fed equivalent quantities of a combination of SME- 10 + CTX. The Minolta coordinate “b” measured in breast skin was a good indicator of YX content in feed, whereas the “a” coordinate measured on the shank showed a linear relationship with the dietary CTX level (r = 0.61, P < 0.0001). The same visual color classification of chickens was achieved irrespective of the rank test performed (by shank or carcass color). Lutein and zeaxanthin from the SME-25 product had lower deposition rates in skin and fat tissues than those from the SME-10 product. This finding seems to be related to the ratio of zeaxanthin stereoisomer RR (optically active) vs. RS that was found in tissues from the SME-10 product (97.8%:2.2%), whereas with SME-25 this ratio was 16.0:84.0%. These results suggest that inclusion of only the SME-25 product could not replace the current addition of SME-10 and CTX combinationsca
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Roche Vitamins Europe Ltd. for their financial and technical support to this studyca
dc.format.extent7ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry Scienceca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleInfluence of Source and Ratio of Xanthophyll Pigments on Broiler Chicken Pigmentation and Performanceca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc636ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.3.320ca
dc.contributor.groupNutrició Animalca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint