Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Comparison of Three Commercial ELISA Kits for Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Serum Samples from Different Animal Species
| dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Bastit, Leira | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marfil, Sílvia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pradenas, Edwards | |
| dc.contributor.author | Blanco, Julià | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vergara-Alert, Júlia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Segalés, Joaquim | |
| dc.contributor.other | Producció Animal | ca |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-19T18:06:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-19T18:06:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Fernández-Bastit, Leira, Sílvia Marfil, Edwards Pradenas, Julià Blanco, Júlia Vergara-Alert, and Joaquim Segalés. 2025. “Comparison of Three Commercial ELISA Kits for Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Serum Samples From Different Animal Species.” Viruses 17 (5): 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050716. | ca |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1999-4915 | ca |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/4732 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, significantly impacting global health, economies, and social stability. In February 2020, the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals were documented, highlighting the potential risks posed by regular human–animal interactions in facilitating viral transmission. In consequence, it is essential to validate surveillance methods for SARS-CoV-2 in animals. In the present study, 101 sera from different animal species (36 cats, 41 dogs, 4 ferrets, 10 wild boar, 6 domestic goats, and 4 lions) were tested using three different ELISA kits to evaluate humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2. ELISA results were compared and correlated with a pseudovirus neutralization test (pVNT), considered as the reference assay. ELISA-1, targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) of SARS-CoV-2, exhibited the highest diagnostic performance, and proved to be a reliable tool for initial screenings in high-throughput animal studies. In contrast, ELISA-2 (also targeting RBD nAbs) and ELISA-3 (targeting nucleoprotein antibodies) demonstrated lower sensitivity for detecting seropositive animals. | ca |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was partially funded by the BBVA Foundation as part of the project ‘Investigation on the potential role of pets as animal reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2’. The authors also acknowledge the crowdfunding initiative #Yomecorono, available online at https://www.yomecorono.com (accessed on 12 December 2024). IRTA (2021 SGR 00825 and 2021 SGR 01385) and IrsiCaixa (2021 SGR 00452) are supported by CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya. | ca |
| dc.format.extent | 16 | ca |
| dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | ca |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Viruses | ca |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | ca |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.title | Comparison of Three Commercial ELISA Kits for Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Serum Samples from Different Animal Species | ca |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca |
| dc.rights.accessLevel | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.embargo.terms | cap | ca |
| dc.subject.udc | 619 | ca |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050716 | ca |
| dc.contributor.group | Sanitat Animal | ca |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
ARTICLES CIENTÍFICS [3.467]

