Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández-Bastit, Leira
dc.contributor.authorMarfil, Sílvia
dc.contributor.authorPradenas, Edwards
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Julià
dc.contributor.authorVergara-Alert, Júlia
dc.contributor.authorSegalés, Joaquim
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-19T18:06:16Z
dc.date.available2025-09-19T18:06:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-16
dc.identifier.citationFernández-Bastit, Leira, Sílvia Marfil, Edwards Pradenas, Julià Blanco, Júlia Vergara-Alert, and Joaquim Segalés. 2025. “Comparison of Three Commercial ELISA Kits for Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Serum Samples From Different Animal Species.” Viruses 17 (5): 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050716.ca
dc.identifier.issn1999-4915ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/4732
dc.description.abstractThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, significantly impacting global health, economies, and social stability. In February 2020, the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals were documented, highlighting the potential risks posed by regular human–animal interactions in facilitating viral transmission. In consequence, it is essential to validate surveillance methods for SARS-CoV-2 in animals. In the present study, 101 sera from different animal species (36 cats, 41 dogs, 4 ferrets, 10 wild boar, 6 domestic goats, and 4 lions) were tested using three different ELISA kits to evaluate humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2. ELISA results were compared and correlated with a pseudovirus neutralization test (pVNT), considered as the reference assay. ELISA-1, targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) of SARS-CoV-2, exhibited the highest diagnostic performance, and proved to be a reliable tool for initial screenings in high-throughput animal studies. In contrast, ELISA-2 (also targeting RBD nAbs) and ELISA-3 (targeting nucleoprotein antibodies) demonstrated lower sensitivity for detecting seropositive animals.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially funded by the BBVA Foundation as part of the project ‘Investigation on the potential role of pets as animal reservoirs for SARS-CoV-2’. The authors also acknowledge the crowdfunding initiative #Yomecorono, available online at https://www.yomecorono.com (accessed on 12 December 2024). IRTA (2021 SGR 00825 and 2021 SGR 01385) and IrsiCaixa (2021 SGR 00452) are supported by CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya.ca
dc.format.extent16ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofVirusesca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleComparison of Three Commercial ELISA Kits for Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Serum Samples from Different Animal Speciesca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/v17050716ca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint