Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.authorSavić, Bojana
dc.contributor.authorŠkrlep, Martin
dc.contributor.authorFont i Furnols, Maria
dc.contributor.authorČandek-Potokar, Marjeta
dc.contributor.otherIndústries Alimentàriesca
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T15:44:48Z
dc.date.available2025-10-22T15:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-01
dc.identifier.citationSavić, Bojana, Martin Škrlep, Maria Font-I-Furnols and Marjeta Čandek-Potokar. 2025. “How local pig breed and processing methods affect consumer preferences for dry-cured ham”. Meat Science 231: 109964. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109964.ca
dc.identifier.issn0309-1740ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/4789
dc.description.abstractTwo dry-cured hams were produced using a local breed Krškopolje pig, trimmed/shaped either as ‘Kraški pršut’ (Ksingle bondK) or ‘Istrski pršut’ (Isingle bondK). Consumers (n = 118) were recruited to evaluate the hams in blind, expected, and informed tests. Overall liking was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, while sensory perceptions were assessed with Check-All-That-Apply method in blind and expected tests. In blind, expected, and informed test, Ksingle bondK received higher liking scores than Isingle bondK. Specifically, for Ksingle bondK, liking was the highest in informed, the lowest in the blind, and intermediate in the expected test, suggesting that information about local breed positively influenced consumer perception. In contrast, Isingle bondK showed similar liking scores in both, blind and informed tests, while the expected liking was notably higher, indicating a mismatch between expectations and actual experience. Check-All-That-Apply results, analyzed with correspondence analysis, showed that Isingle bondK and Ksingle bondK hams were differentiated by consumers based on sensory descriptors. Furthermore, the analysis highlighted differences between expected and perceived sensory descriptors.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study has received funding from Slovenian Agency of Research and Innovation (grants P4-0133, L7-4568) and Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food (L7-4568). We would also like to thank ARHEA agency for recruiting the consumers and conducting the sessions.
dc.format.extent4ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofMeat Scienceca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleHow local pig breed and processing methods affect consumer preferences for dry-cured hamca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc663/664ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109964ca
dc.contributor.groupQualitat i Tecnologia Alimentàriaca


Fitxers en aquest element

 

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Excepte que s'indiqui una altra cosa, la llicència de l'ítem es descriu com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Comparteix a TwitterComparteix a LinkedinComparteix a FacebookComparteix a TelegramComparteix a WhatsappImprimeix