Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBaune, Marie-Christin
dc.contributor.authorJanuschewski, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorBussa, Maresa
dc.contributor.authorVan De Walle, Simon
dc.contributor.authorGifuni, Imma
dc.contributor.authorCavaco Rodrigues, Alexandre Miguel
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Maria Helena
dc.contributor.authorVan Royen, Geert
dc.contributor.authorJuadjur, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorJungbluth, Niels
dc.contributor.authorTerjung, Nino
dc.contributor.authorCastellari, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorfanari, fabio
dc.contributor.otherIndústries Alimentàriesca
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-08T21:07:03Z
dc.date.available2025-11-08T21:07:03Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-12
dc.identifier.issn2211-9264ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/4835
dc.description.abstractThe microalgae Chlorella vulgaris is an interesting emerging food source, but to compete with other alternative protein sources, production costs must be reduced. The drying process plays a critical role in production as it ensures product stabilization and quality preservation. However, drying is a cost-intensive process and different drying methods and drying parameters can significantly affect the composition and quality of the final product. This study analyzed the effects of the conventional drying methods freeze drying (FD) and spray drying (SprD) as well as the innovative drying methods solar drying (SolD), pulse combustion drying (PCD) and agitated thin film drying (ATFD) on the nutrient composition, the content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, the microbial count (total bacterial count, yeasts, molds, E. coli) as well as the environmental impact and production cost. Except for ATFD, showing changes in the carbohydrate and fiber content, the effects of drying methods on nutrient composition were minor. SprD was identified as having the greatest environmental impact and being the most cost-intensive, whereas SolD performed best, with only a slight reduction in vitamin B6 and some mineral elements compared to FD. PCD performed second best but needs improvement in terms of drying yield to reduce production costs.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [Project ProFuture, grant agreement No 862980].ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofAlgal Researchca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleInnovative vs. classical methods for drying heterotrophic Chlorella vulgaris: Impact on the nutritional properties, safety, sustainability and costsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDEC/H2020/862980/EU/MICROALGAE PROTEIN INGREDIENTS FOR THE FOOD AND FEED OF THE FUTURE/ProFutureca
dc.subject.udc663/664ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2025.103913ca
dc.contributor.groupFuncionalitat i Seguretat Alimentàriaca


Ficheros en el ítem

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir