Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIslam, Yasir
dc.contributor.authorPreti, Michele
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Alan L.
dc.contributor.authorBasoalto, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorBosch-Serra, Dolors
dc.contributor.authorPeñalver Cruz, Ainara
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Marcela A.
dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Contreras, Eduardo
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-07T19:11:27Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-20
dc.identifier.issn0171-8177ca
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/5130
dc.descriptionAquest recurs no està disponible en accés obert per política de l’editorial. This item isn't open access because of publisher's Policyca
dc.description.abstractSex pheromone-based mating disruption (MD) is used to manage the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in vineyards of Europe and South America. Monitoring of EGVM with sex pheromone lures under MD is difficult and alternative methods to track this pest are needed. A lure comprised of 2-phenyl ethanol and acetic acid (2-PET/AA) is attractive for EGVM but has not been tested under MD nor in combination with light emitting diodes (LEDs) enhancing moths catch. Traps baited with the 2-PET/AA lure with or without LEDs emitting three different peak wavelengths (UV-A, blue, and green) were compared with traps baited with a sex pheromone lure. Experiments were performed in vineyards under MD in both Chile and Spain. Traps with 2-PET/AA with LEDs caught significantly more total moths than traps with sex pheromone lures from late season in Chile. The addition of the UV-A LED significantly increased EGVM catches from the 2-PET/AA lure alone from mid to late season in Chile and Spain. The addition of the UV-A LED with the 2-PET/AA lure outperformed both the blue and green LEDs for females and total moths from late season in Chile and Spain. The proportions of female EGVM mated were not different between treatments, but were variable among trials and increased seasonally. Catches of some groups of non-targets (other lepidopterans and dipterans) increased with the use of the UV-A LED and were on average much greater than of EGVM, but did not prevent the higher catches of EGVM with this treatment.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Dr. Blas Lavandero (Universidad de Talca) for assistance with statistical analysis, and Elías González and Alexis Muñoz for field work support. We also thank “Programa Nacional de Lobesia botrana” (SAG, Chile) for the collaboration in the selection of vineyards for the field trials in Chile. YI was supported by ANID PhD Scholarship 21220564, and funding from Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Talca. The authors also thank partial funding from Research Ring in Pest Insects and Climate Change (ANID ATE/230025). Also, thanks to the CERCA project of the Generalitat of Catalonia.ca
dc.format.extent9ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSchweizerbart Science Publishersca
dc.relation.ispartofEntomologia Generalisca
dc.rightsCopyright © 2025 E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 70176 Stuttgart, Germanyca
dc.titleIntegrated monitoring of Lobesia botrana using LED traps and allelochemicals in pheromone-disrupted vineyardsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.date.embargoEnd9999-01-01
dc.embargo.termsforeverca
dc.subject.udc632ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/3413ca
dc.contributor.groupProtecció Vegetal Sostenibleca


Files in this item

This document contains embargoed files indefinitely

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint