Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEcheverría-Progulakis, Sebastián
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Eixarch, Maite
dc.contributor.authorBoinot, Sébastien
dc.contributor.authorBoix, Dani
dc.contributor.authorCarreras-Sempere, Mar
dc.contributor.authorCatala-Forner, Mar
dc.contributor.authorExpósito, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorGiné, Ariadna
dc.contributor.authorGuivernau, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorJornet, Lluís
dc.contributor.authorLlevat, Raul
dc.contributor.authorNoguerol-Arias, Joan
dc.contributor.authorSorribas, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorViñas, Marc
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Méndez, Néstor
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-13T10:12:48Z
dc.date.available2026-03-13T10:12:48Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-23
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901ca
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/5138
dc.description.abstract1. Rice agroecosystems are important contributors to climate change through methane (CH4) emissions, while also representing biodiversity hotspots and providing agroecosystem services (ES). Non-continuous flooding irrigation strategies have been globally implemented as climate change mitigation and adaptation practices in rice paddy fields as they decrease CH4 emissions and water use. Although such effects have been widely studied, there is a knowledge gap regarding outcomes in terms of biodiversity and overall agroecosystem multifunctionality. 2. Here, we implemented a field-scale experiment to assess the effects of different irrigation strategies across a water use gradient (CON: continuous flooding; MSD: mid-season drainage; and AWD: alternate wetting and drying) on (i) the provision of ES (i.e. biodiversity conservation, regulating and provisioning services), (ii) overall agroecosystem multifunctionality and (iii) synergies or trade-offs among ES. 3. None of the irrigation strategies benefited most taxa or improve most regulating services. For instance, AWD generally benefited invertebrate diversity while reducing vertebrate abundances and grain yields. Both AWD and MSD decreased CH4 emissions by approximately 80 kg C-CH4 ha−1 but decreased soil carbon storage by 8.8%, when compared to continuously flooded fields. Consequently, all irrigation strategies exhibited a similar level of multifunctionality, although providing different services. Lastly, we did not find trade-offs or synergies between biodiversity conservation, regulating services and provisioning services. 4. Synthesis and applications. These results suggest that, from a landscape management perspective, implementing a single irrigation strategy at large spatial scales should be discouraged due to potential negative effects on particular sets of ES components. Conversely, a mosaic of irrigation strategies should be implemented, promoting ES components aligned with site-specific landscape management objectives.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Trade and Enterprise (MINECO) through the Grants PID2020-118650RR-C31 and PID2023-151621OR-I00 (funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). The Government of Catalonia funded the predoctoral fellowship of S.E.-P. through the projects AgriCarboniCat and AgriRegenCat. N.P.-M. is supported by a Spanish ‘Ramón y Cajal’ fellowship (RYC-2021-033599-I). We thank Carles Alcaraz for his guidance in regards to data analysis. We also thank Lluis Matamoros, Josep Borrul, Guillem Rovira, Andrea Bertomeu, Vicent Cebolla, Joan Didac Bertomeu and Juan Blas Fernández-Araujo for their lab and field support, and for the implementation of water strategies. The support of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya, is also acknowledged. IRTA's authors M.V., M.C.-S., J.N. and M.G. are part of the Consolidated Research Group of Sustainability in Biosystems, funded by AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya; ref. 2021 SGR 01568).
dc.format.extent17ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Ecologyca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.titleImpact of climate change mitigation strategies in rice farming on agroecosystem multifunctionalityca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMICINN/Programa Estatal de generación del conocimiento y fortalecimiento científico y tecnológico del sistema I+D+I y Programa Estatal de I+D+I orientada a los retos de la sociedad/PID2020-118650RR-C31/ES/Aumento de la eficiencia del uso del agua en cereales mediante su gestión y mejora genética: implicaciones para la biodiversidad, adaptación y mitigación del cambio climático/ca
dc.relation.projectIDMICIU/Programa Estatal para Impulsar la Investigación Científico-Técnica y su Transferencia/PID2023-151621OR-I00/ES/Interacción de paisaje y manejo de agua en producción de arroz: impacto en la biodiversidad acuatica y el control biologico de plagas/ca
dc.relation.projectIDMICINN/ /RYC2021-033599-I/ES/ /ca
dc.subject.udc574ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70303ca
dc.contributor.groupAigües Marines i Continentalsca
dc.contributor.groupCultius Extensius Sosteniblesca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint