Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGao, Rui
dc.contributor.authorAlsina, Maria Mar
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Rua, Alfonso F.
dc.contributor.authorHipps, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorKustas, William P.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Martha
dc.contributor.authorNieto, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorMcElrone, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorKnipper, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorBambach Ortiz, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Sebastian J.
dc.contributor.authorPrueger, John H.
dc.contributor.authorAlfieri, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Lynn G.
dc.contributor.authorWhite, William A.
dc.contributor.authorGao, Feng
dc.contributor.authorCoopmans, Calvin
dc.contributor.authorGowing, Ian
dc.contributor.authorAgam, Nurit
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, Luis
dc.contributor.authorDokoozlian, Nick
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-20T10:42:07Z
dc.date.available2026-03-20T10:42:07Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-14
dc.identifier.issn1432-1319ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/5162
dc.description.abstractEfficient irrigation management is essential for sustainable crop production under increasing temperatures and tightening water supplies. In vineyards, water status significantly influences vine growth, yield, and fruit quality, and deficit irrigation is often used to impose controlled stress while avoiding damaging levels of water limitation. This creates a practical need for routine, field-scale monitoring of vine water status. In this study, we developed an operational machine-learning framework to estimate grapevine leaf water potential (Ψleaf) by integrating daytime sUAS thermal imagery with short-term local meteorological information. When all candidate predictors were included, the trained eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model achieved R2 = 0.71, RMSE = 0.14 MPa, and bias = − 0.06 MPa on the independent test dataset. A simplified XGB model using a compact predictor set–maximum air temperature in the 24 h prior to flight, air temperature at flight time, their difference, and canopy temperature – achieved R2 = 0.63, RMSE = 0.16 MPa, and bias = − 0.06 MPa, with performance not significantly different from the full model at α = 0.05. This reduced-feature formulation supports vineyardscale Ψleaf estimation and mapping while maintaining strong predictive skill and low computational burden. Our research highlights the potential for broader applicability, particularly for monitoring rapidly developing hot and dry conditions and supporting adaptive water resource management.ca
dc.description.sponsorshipFunds for this study were provided by the USDA USU NACA grants, with data collected by previous NASA grant. Student support was provided by the graduate assistantship at the Utah Water Research Laboratory.
dc.format.extent18ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherSpringerca
dc.relation.ispartofIrrigation Scienceca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleA machine learning framework for California vineyard water status monitoring using sUAS Imagery and short-term meteorological dataca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc634ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-026-01102-8ca
dc.contributor.groupFructiculturaca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint