Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Søren Saxmose
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Julio
dc.contributor.authorBoklund, Anette
dc.contributor.authorDippel, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorDorea, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorFiguerola, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorHerskin, Mette S.
dc.contributor.authorMiranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
dc.contributor.authorNannoni, Eleonora
dc.contributor.authorNonno, Romolo
dc.contributor.authorRiber, Anja B.
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Karl
dc.contributor.authorStegeman, Jan Arend
dc.contributor.authorThulke, Hans-Hermann
dc.contributor.authorTuyttens, Frank
dc.contributor.authorMichel, Virginie
dc.contributor.authorWinckler, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorRaj, Mohan
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorVyssotski, Alexei
dc.contributor.authorVan der Stede, Yves
dc.contributor.authorManakidou, Aikaterini
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-20T16:54:01Z
dc.date.available2026-03-20T16:54:01Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-26
dc.identifier.issn1831-4732ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/5166
dc.description.abstractThe EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the use of Diathermic Syncope® (DTS) for stunning cattle. A dossier was provided by the applicant as the basis for an assessment of the extent to which the method is able to provide a level of animal welfare at least equivalent to that ensured by the currently allowed methods for stunning cattle. This scientific opinion followed the EFSA Guidance (2018) on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at time of killing. Under Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009, approval of novel stunning methods requires demonstration of (1) the absence of pain, distress or suffering until the onset of unconsciousness and (2) that the animal remains unconscious until death. An ad hoc Working Group (WG) by EFSA performed the assessment as follows: (1) check of provided data against the criteria laid down in the EFSA Guidance; (2) extensive literature search; (3) data extraction and quantitative assessment; (4) exercise based on non-formal expert elicitation and qualitative assessment. Although the data and studies provided in the dossier only partially fulfilled the necessary criteria, they were sufficient to proceed with the animal welfare risk assessment. According to the data and the use of DTS parameterised by the applicant (delivering 160–200 kJ of energy and an incident power of 16–20 kW for 10 s), DTS does not ensure a level of welfare at least equivalent to one or more of the currently allowed methods listed in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009.ca
dc.format.extent101ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherWileyca
dc.relation.ispartofEFSA Journalca
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleThe use of Diathermic Syncope® for stunning cattleca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc636ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9934ca
dc.contributor.groupBenestar Animalca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint