Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Niño, Jesús María
dc.contributor.authorBogena, Heye Reemt
dc.contributor.authorHuisman, Johan Alexander
dc.contributor.authorSchilling, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorCasadesús, Jaume
dc.contributor.otherProducció Vegetalca
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T15:20:25Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T15:20:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-13
dc.identifier.citationDomínguez-Niño, Jesús María, Heye Reemt Bogena, Johan Alexander Huisman, Bernd Schilling, and Jaume Casadesús. 2019. "On The Accuracy Of Factory-Calibrated Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors". Sensors 19 (14): 3101. MDPI AG. doi:10.3390/s19143101.ca
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/575
dc.description.abstractSoil water content (SWC) monitoring is often used to optimize agricultural irrigation. Commonly, capacitance sensors are used for this task. However, the factory calibrations have been often criticized for their limited accuracy. The aim of this paper is to test the degree of improvement of various sensor- and soil-specific calibration options compared to factory calibrations by taking the 10HS sensor as an example. To this end, a two-step sensor calibration was carried out. In the first step, the sensor response was related to dielectric permittivity using calibration in media with well-defined permittivity. The second step involved the establishment of a site-specific relationship between permittivity and soil water content using undisturbed soil samples and time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurements. Our results showed that a model, which considered the mean porosity and a fitted dielectric permittivity of the solid phase for each soil and depth, provided the best fit between bulk permittivity and SWC. Most importantly, it was found that the two-step calibration approach (RMSE: 1.03 vol.%) provided more accurate SWC estimates compared to the factory calibration (RMSE: 5.33 vol.%). Finally, we used these calibrations on data from drip-irrigated almond and apple orchards and compared the factory calibration with our two-step calibration approach.ca
dc.format.extent18ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofSensorsca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleOn the accuracy of factory-calibrated low-cost soil water content sensorsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.relation.projectIDMINECO/Programa Estatal de promoción del talento y su empleabilidad en I+D+I/RTA2013-00045-C04-01/ES/Incorporación de inteligencia artificial en los algoritmos de reprogramación del riego localizado/ca
dc.subject.udc631/635ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s19143101ca
dc.contributor.groupÚs Eficient de l'Aigua en Agriculturaca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/