Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSibila, M.
dc.contributor.authorGuevara, G.
dc.contributor.authorCuadrado, R.
dc.contributor.authorPleguezuelos, P.
dc.contributor.authorPérez, D.
dc.contributor.authorPérez de Rozas, A.
dc.contributor.authorHuerta, E.
dc.contributor.authorLlorens, A.
dc.contributor.authorValero, O.
dc.contributor.authorPérez, M.
dc.contributor.authorLópez, C.
dc.contributor.authorKrejci, R.
dc.contributor.authorSegalés, J.
dc.contributor.otherProducció Animalca
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T09:51:02Z
dc.date.available2020-05-08T09:51:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-04
dc.identifier.citationSibila, M., G. Guevara, R. Cuadrado, P. Pleguezuelos, D. Pérez, A. Pérez de Rozas, and E. Huerta et al. 2020. "Comparison Of Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniae And Porcine Circovirus 2 Commercial Vaccines Efficacy When Applied Separate Or Combined Under Experimental Conditions". Porcine Health Management 6 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1186/s40813-020-00148-0.ca
dc.identifier.issn2055-5660ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/785
dc.description.abstractBackground Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) and Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV-2) are two of the most significant infectious agents causing economic losses in the weaning to slaughter period. Due to their similar vaccination age, the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of two already existing Mhyo (Hyogen®) and PCV-2 (Circovac®) vaccines when administered separately or combined (RTM) by means of Mhyo or PCV-2 experimental challenges. Results Seven groups of animals were included in the study, being three of them challenged with PCV-2, three with Mhyo and one composed of non-challenged, non-vaccinated pigs. Within each experimental challenge, non-vaccinated (NV) groups were compared with double vaccinated groups using the commercial products separated (VS) or combined (VC). Both vaccinated groups showed significant differences for most parameters measured regarding PCV-2 (serology, percentage of infected animals and viral load in tissues) and Mhyo (serology and gross lesions) when compared to NV groups. VS and VC offered similar results, being only significantly different the PCV-2 antibody values at different time points (higher in the VS group) of the study, although not at the termination day (21 days post-PCV-2 inoculation). Conclusion The present study expands the knowledge on the possibility of using two separate Mhyo and PCV-2 commercial vaccines as a RTM product, which offered equivalent virological, immunological and pathological outcomes as compared to these vaccines when used by separate.ca
dc.format.extent11ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherBMCca
dc.relation.ispartofPorcine Health Managementca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleComparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditionsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc619ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00148-0ca
dc.contributor.groupSanitat Animalca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint