Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLópez-Mas, Laura
dc.contributor.authorClaret, Anna
dc.contributor.authorReinders, Machiel J.
dc.contributor.authorBanovic, Marija
dc.contributor.authorKrystallis, Athanasios
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero, Luis
dc.contributor.otherIndústries Alimentàriesca
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-03T10:19:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-03
dc.identifier.citationLópez-Mas, Laura, Anna Claret, Machiel J. Reinders, Marija Banovic, Athanasios Krystallis, and Luis Guerrero. 2020. "Farmed Or Wild Fish? Segmenting European Consumers Based On Their Beliefs". Aquaculture, 735992. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735992.ca
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/961
dc.description.abstractWild fish cannot meet the global demand of fish, making aquaculture the most suitable alternative to support increase in fish consumption. However, farmed fish have a less positive image among consumers than their respective wild-caught equivalents. Food product images can be affected by consumers' beliefs, which are useful to infer the quality of the food product and the consumers' food choices. This paper investigates European consumers' beliefs regarding farmed versus wild fish. The goal is to understand not only what hinders farmed fish consumption but also provide guidelines for producers and governments to improve the image of farmed fish. An online questionnaire reaching 2511 consumers in five European Union (EU) countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) assessed 19 beliefs. The results showed that European consumers believed that wild fish had a higher quality, but that farmed fish were superior in terms of control, price, and availability. Even though most consumers were in favour of wild fish, they reported higher consumption of farmed fish, suggesting that positive perceptions of products do not necessarily drive higher consumption. European consumers also believed that farmed fish were less fresh and contained higher concentrations of antibiotics than wild fish. These inferential beliefs that view aquaculture negatively should be addressed in future marketing campaigns to transform them into informational beliefs. Promotional and marketing campaigns should reinforce the positive attributes of farmed fish, including their lower levels of chemical hazards (e.g. heavy metals and marine pollutants) and biological hazards (e.g. parasites). Based on the assessed beliefs, consumers were categorised into five clusters of individuals: pro-wild fish, slightly pro-wild fish, balanced view, open to aquaculture, and pro-aquaculture. The identification of these consumer segments and their profiles should help producers and marketers focus their efforts to enhance the image of the aquaculture.ca
dc.format.extent41ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofAquacultureca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleFarmed or wild fish? Segmenting European consumers based on their beliefsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.relation.projectIDEC/FP7/603121/EU/Exploring the biological and socio-economic potential of new-emerging candidate fish species for the expansion of the European aquaculture industry/DIVERSIFYca
dc.subject.udc663/664ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735992ca
dc.contributor.groupQualitat i Tecnologia Alimentàriaca


Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint